Manhunt 2 / The Globe and Mail

“I can only guess that the reason that Rockstar Games so happily censored their own title for release is that, unlike the original Manhunt, the artistic intent behind Manhunt 2 just isn’t strong enough to justify it. If the original Manhunt attempted to be the video game equivalent of a George A. Romero film, with stomach churning violence and genuine social commentary, Manhunt 2′s aspirations are barely as high as a straight-to-video slasher film.”

I’ve mentioned Manhunt 2 on this blog before, and here’s my review of it. Now, I’ve got a lot of time for the original Manhunt – though tremendously flawed, there were some really clever ideas in it. In fact, I’d go as far as to say it’s actually got more interesting things to say about morality than Bioshock does.

I’m sure a lot of people would argue with me that my interpretation of the original Manhunt is giving too much credit to Rockstar, and whoever decided to make the sequel apparently didn’t see any of what I saw either. They’ve created an utterly horrible, indefensible piece of shit inspired by the current “torture porn” craze that, like crap like the Saw films (or whatever) doesn’t even try to say anything with its (incredibly obscured) violence.

I’m happy to defend Manhunt 2′s right to exist (even in uncensored form) but I’d be happier if it didn’t. Or rather, if there wasn’t a market for it.

Published by mathewkumar, on November 3rd, 2007. Filed under: Reviews, The Globe and Mail1 Comment

One Response to “Manhunt 2 / The Globe and Mail”

  1. I spent a little time with the AO rated leak and I pretty much agree with you. I was going to write something up about how all the negative attention the game’s getting makes it look like an honest game (something which is even a ballsy claim for the first manhunt) and is going to garnish better sales than it should. It seems like other people have this covered better than I do though, its nice too see I’m not crazy at least.

    Comment by Matthew Williamson on November 3, 2007 at 11:14 pm



Leave a Reply